<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Associated Content Is A Bit Dishonest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/</link>
	<description>Work From Home Jobs &#124; Ways To Make Money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:12:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: online poker</title>
		<link>http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/comment-page-1/#comment-93199</link>
		<dc:creator>online poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/#comment-93199</guid>
		<description>Very sorry to hear about that. I have written few articles for them, but, they don&#039;t pay exactly what they promise to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sorry to hear about that. I have written few articles for them, but, they don&#8217;t pay exactly what they promise to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/comment-page-1/#comment-91415</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/#comment-91415</guid>
		<description>associated content is only good when you want to make $20-$35 a day of easy money and want to supplement your income. But, AC is REALLY dishonest and fake as hell. They shut down the referall program because they didn&#039;t want to PAY...even though their site is worth millions. The only reason I won&#039;t slam AC so bad is because they do allow writers to make money even if the articles are kind of crappy.

The problem is, most REAL writers go there expecting to make $20 an article. AC need to take down their fake advertisment ($3-$40) per article. Try $2-$3 per article. This is the average. It use to be done you could get at least $4. I think because of the recession, AC has been getting too many writers than they are willing to pay for. Well, you could always go there to make an extra buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>associated content is only good when you want to make $20-$35 a day of easy money and want to supplement your income. But, AC is REALLY dishonest and fake as hell. They shut down the referall program because they didn&#8217;t want to PAY&#8230;even though their site is worth millions. The only reason I won&#8217;t slam AC so bad is because they do allow writers to make money even if the articles are kind of crappy.</p>
<p>The problem is, most REAL writers go there expecting to make $20 an article. AC need to take down their fake advertisment ($3-$40) per article. Try $2-$3 per article. This is the average. It use to be done you could get at least $4. I think because of the recession, AC has been getting too many writers than they are willing to pay for. Well, you could always go there to make an extra buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenin Nair</title>
		<link>http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/comment-page-1/#comment-52292</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenin Nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dayjobnuker.com/2007/12/19/associated-content-is-a-bit-dishonest/#comment-52292</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t say they are quite dishonest. But there is noway of course to prove it. However, their public business practice of not paying enough to their writers (who make money for them) is highly deplorable. Here is a review: &lt;a href=&quot;http://cutewriting.blogspot.com/2008/05/unethical-business-practices-by.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Unethical business practices of AC&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t say they are quite dishonest. But there is noway of course to prove it. However, their public business practice of not paying enough to their writers (who make money for them) is highly deplorable. Here is a review: <a href="http://cutewriting.blogspot.com/2008/05/unethical-business-practices-by.html" rel="nofollow">Unethical business practices of AC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
